Beijing Setting Up a Trap to Collect Money From Wall Street, Says China Experts

Share on facebook
Share
Share on twitter
Tweet
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp

BY Justin Zhang

News analysis

Chinese companies are transitioning to a different model to raise money by going public. When one of China’s concept stocks is delisted from the United States, it is then listed in Hong Kong or China. At the same time, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is working hard to present an image of economic prosperity to attract foreign investment. Experts believe that these moves are a trap set by the CCP to deceive overseas investors.

On Dec. 22, China Mobile launched the IPO application process, expecting to be listed in China in January 2022. In addition, China Unicom, China Telecom, as well as China Mobile, the three major Chinese telecom operators that were delisted from the United States, have all transferred back to China for A-share listing.

Didi, the Chinese version of Uber, which delisted its shares from the New York Stock Exchange under pressure from Chinese authorities, indicated that it will go public in Hong Kong instead.

The CCP has devised a new retreat strategy: state-owned firms to return to China’s stock market from Wall Street, and private firms to return to Hong Kong for listing, experts said.

Mike Sun, a Chinese investment strategy expert living in the United States, told The Epoch Times that the CCP probably truly wants to see this happen. Chinese authorities are still negotiating with the U.S. government for the Chinese concept stocks to stay. If they can’t, it would not be a bad thing for the CCP to have these companies return to China for listing.

As the United States has become increasingly stringent in its supervision of listed companies from China, it is very likely that more Chinese concept stocks will withdraw from the U.S. stock market. On Dec. 20, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) required listed Chinese companies to disclose more risks that they may bring to investors.

Prior to this, the amended Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act began requiring foreign companies to disclose more information about their relationship with the government and more details of their financial reports. However, these regulations were rejected by the CCP on the grounds of “endangering national security.”

As of the end of 2020, more than 600 Chinese companies were listed in the United States, with a total market value of approximately $6 trillion, accounting for about 9 percent of the total U.S. stock market. However, Chinese concept stocks withdrawing from the United States has become an irreversible trend in the last three years.

Hong Kong financial analyst Katherine Jiang told The Epoch Times that if these companies return to China for listing, they will still be able to bring with them huge amounts of capital from Wall Street.

Loosening Monetary Policies to Beat the Fed

Now, as the market expects the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates ahead of schedule and more aggressively, the CCP is also stepping up its monetary and fiscal policies.

Contrary to the Fed’s tightening of the monetary policy, the CCP continues to run on the path of a loose monetary policy, which it officially named “cross-cyclical and counter-cyclical macro-control.”

The CCP’s Central Bank on Dec. 20 decided to lower the benchmark loan prime rate (LPR) from 3.85 percent to 3.8 percent. The bank’s reserve ratio was lowered in early December, freeing up approximately $190 billion.

According to Sun, internally, the CCP is facing tremendous pressure to stabilize the economy. Meanwhile, externally it has to keep an eye on the Fed’s timetable in conjunction with its own monetary policies, in order to prevent large-scale capital outflow.

Therefore, the CCP’s newly formulated policies serve two purposes—to secure foreign funds and prevent capital outflow. To achieve these goals, the CCP has created an image of economic prosperity, Sun said.

“In the past, Wall Street fed the Chinese companies very well. Even if these companies are now forced to return to China to be listed on domestic stock exchanges, they have already collected a lot of money from Wall Street.”

Among the Chinese companies listed in the United States, there are many state-owned or semi-state-owned companies that are disguised as private companies. The company filings are now relatively complete, making it difficult for the SEC to verify their background.

Take Fangda Group as an example. Based in Liaoning Province, Fangda, a so-called private enterprise, is an industrial conglomerate focusing on carbon, chemicals, medical, and steel products manufacturing.

Fang Wei, Chairman of the Board of Directors, said on Dec 8: “We have always insisted on listening to the Party and following the Party. We now have more than 300 legal entities. As I often say, the Fangda Group belongs to the Party, the country, and the society. ”

Fangda Group is the only strategic investor in the restructuring of HNA Group Co. Ltd., after the latter filed for bankruptcy.

Under the guise of “private enterprises,” these companies have completely bypassed the laws of the United States, as it is extremely difficult to trace such deep and hidden connections.

Although the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act is now forcing Chinese companies to exit U.S. stock exchanges, the CCP may well be willing to welcome Chinese concept stock companies back to their domestic listings at this time.

Jiang said that the CCP is expanding the capital market and needs suitable assets to attract overseas funds to stay in the Chinese market for the long term. Even if these companies return to Hong Kong or China now, not only have they already collected money, but companies with good potential can also continue to attract foreign investments.

Connecting the financial markets of mainland China and Hong Kong is a key part of the CCP’s capital expansion plan. The CCP hopes to use the Hong Kong market to attract outside capital to stay in China’s capital market for a long time, Sun said.

He believes that the CCP is trying to attract foreign investment through the “economic prosperity” created by the release of huge amounts of funds into its financial system, which is equivalent to setting up a trap to lure foreign investments.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Justin Zhang

Justin Zhang has been analyzing and writing articles on China issues since 2012. He can be contacted at justinzhang1996@gmail.com

Subscribe for Newsletter

Sign up to receive important news avoided by other media.

Scroll to Top