The Dying Art of Conversation—Has Technology Killed Our Ability to Talk Face-to-Face?

Devices and apps can help us communicate around the globe, but they are blocking our direct connection to those nearby

Our-intimacy-our-devices-connecting -around -us
Our intimacy with our devices comes at the expense of connecting with those around us.(Kevin Grieve/Unsplash)
By Melanie Chan, Leeds Beckett University

Facetime, Skype, Whatsapp, and Snapchat, have replaced significant amounts of face-to-face conversation for many people.

These apps allow us to converse with each other quickly and easily—overcoming distances, time zones, and countries. We can even talk to virtual assistants such as Alexa, Cortana, or Siri—commanding them to play our favorite songs, films, or tell us the weather forecast.

These ways of communicating reduce the need to speak to another human being. This has led to some of the conversational snippets of our daily lives now taking place mainly via technological devices. So no longer do we need to talk with shop assistants, receptionists, bus drivers, or even coworkers, we simply engage with a screen to communicate whatever it is we want to say.

In fact, in these scenarios, we tend to only speak to other people when digital technology doesn’t operate successfully. For instance, human contact occurs when we call for an assistant to help us when an item is not recognized at the self-service checkout.

And when we have the ability to connect so quickly and easily with others using devices and applications, it is easy to start to overlook the value of face-to-face conversation. It seems easier to text someone rather than meet with them.

Bodily Cues

My research into digital technologies indicates that phrases such as “word of mouth” or “keeping in touch” point to the importance of face-to-face conversation. Indeed, face-to-face conversation can strengthen social ties: with our neighbors, friends, work colleagues, and other people we encounter during our day. It acknowledges their existence, their humanness, in ways that instant messaging and texting do not.

Face-to-face conversation is a rich experience that involves drawing on memories, making connections, making mental images, associations and choosing a response. Face-to-face conversation is also multisensory: it’s not just about sending or receiving pre-programmed trinkets such as likes, cartoon love hearts, and grinning yellow emojis.

losing human touch
It might be quicker and easier, but are we losing the human touch? (Shutterstock)

When having a conversation using video you mainly see another person’s face only as a flat image on a screen. But when we have a face-to-face conversation in real life, we can look into someone’s eyes, reach out and touch them. We can also observe the other person’s body posture and the gestures they use when speaking—and interpret these accordingly. All these factors, contribute to the sensory intensity and depth of the face-to-face conversations we have in daily life.

Speaking to Machines

Sherry Turkle, professor of social studies of science and technology, warns that when we first “speak through machines, [we] forget how essential face-to-face conversation is to our relationships, our creativity, and our capacity for empathy.” But then “we take a further step and speak not just through machines but to machines.”

In many ways, our everyday lives now involve a blend of face-to-face and technologically mediated forms of communication. But in my teaching and research, I explain how digital forms of communication can supplement, rather than replace face-to-face conversation.

At the same time though, it is also important to acknowledge that some people value online communication because they can express themselves in ways they might find difficult through face-to-face conversation.

Look Up From Your Phone

Gary Turk is a spoken word poet whose poem “Look Up” illustrates what is at stake by becoming entranced by technological ways of communicating at the expense of connecting with others face-to-face.

Turk’s poem draws attention to the rich, sensory aspects of face-to-face communication, valuing bodily presence in relation to friendship, companionship, and intimacy. The central idea running through Turk’s evocative poem is that screen-based devices consume our attention while distancing us from the bodily sense of being with others.

Ultimately the sound, touch, smell, and observation of bodily cues we experience when having a face-to-face conversation cannot be fully replaced by our technological devices. Communicating and connecting with others through face-to-face discussion is valuable because it is not something that can be edited, paused or replayed.

So next time you’re deciding between human or machine at the supermarket checkout or whether to get up from your desk and walk to another office to talk to a colleague—rather than sending them an email—it might be worth following Turk’s advice and engaging with the human rather than the screen.

Melanie Chan is a senior lecturer in media, communication, and culture at Leeds Beckett University in the UK. This article was first published on The Conversation.

Please make a small contribution to The Epoch Times and you’ll be making a big difference.The Epoch Times is committed to truthful, responsible journalism. We cover important news other media ignore. Case in point: we have been at the forefront of reporting on the positive changes our country is seeing, such as a record-breaking economy and record low unemployment, while also exposing socialist influence in America. Our Editor-in-chief Jasper Fakkert urges you to support our independent media. Every contribution, big or small, counts. Help us keep piercing through the surface narratives of other media, and bring you a comprehensive picture of what’s really happening in our world. Let’s walk this path together. Please donate today.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive important news avoided by other media.
Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply